Skip to content

Handle case where IPostDataElement.Bytes is null#5120

Merged
amaitland merged 1 commit intocefsharp:masterfrom
Matheos96:patch-1
Jun 17, 2025
Merged

Handle case where IPostDataElement.Bytes is null#5120
amaitland merged 1 commit intocefsharp:masterfrom
Matheos96:patch-1

Conversation

@Matheos96
Copy link
Contributor

@Matheos96 Matheos96 commented Jun 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Summary: [summary of the change and which issue is fixed here]

  • We noticed that we had to check the IPostDataElement.Bytes array for null ourselves before calling .GetBody(). This felt a bit weird, so I think it makes sense to handle this in CefSharp code like I did here.

Changes: [specify the structures changed]

  • Added null check for Bytes of IPostDataElement object

How Has This Been Tested?
By calling .GetBody() on a IPostDataElement object with PostDataType.Empty and Bytes = null.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Updated documentation

Checklist:

  • Tested the code(if applicable)
  • Commented my code
  • Changed the documentation(if applicable)
  • New files have a license disclaimer
  • The formatting is consistent with the project (project supports .editorconfig)

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 16, 2025 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

A null check was added to the GetBody method in the PostDataExtensions class to ensure that if the bytes array is null or empty, the method returns null. No other logic or public interface changes were introduced.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
CefSharp/PostDataExtensions.cs Added a null check for the bytes array in GetBody.

Poem

In the land of code, a check was born,
For bytes that vanish or never were sworn.
Now GetBody is wise,
Nulls bring no surprise,
And rabbits hop on, bug-free and warm! 🐇

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Docstrings were successfully generated. (🔄 Check again to generate docstrings again)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

coderabbitai[bot]
coderabbitai bot reviewed Jun 16, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
CefSharp/PostDataExtensions.cs (1)

73-81: XML summary now slightly outdated – mention the null return case

The <returns> section still states “encoded string” but the method can now (and previously could) return null for both empty and null byte arrays. A tiny doc tweak prevents confusion for consumers relying on IntelliSense.

-        /// <returns>encoded string</returns>
+        /// <returns>
+        /// The decoded string, or <c>null</c> if <see cref="IPostDataElement.Bytes"/> is
+        /// <c>null</c> or empty.
+        /// </returns>
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 58665d5 and 39f4683.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • CefSharp/PostDataExtensions.cs (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
CefSharp/PostDataExtensions.cs (1)

84-87: Fixed potential NullReferenceException; implementation looks good

Early-returning when bytes is null closes the loophole that previously led to an NRE and keeps the behaviour consistent with the empty-array case. Nice, minimal patch!

@AppVeyorBot
Copy link

AppVeyorBot commented Jun 16, 2025

✅ Build CefSharp 137.0.100-CI5270 completed (commit 052ebdceb9 by @Matheos96)

coderabbitai bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 17, 2025
@coderabbitai
📝 Add docstrings to patch-1
fd404d8 
Docstrings generation was requested by @amaitland.

* #5120 (comment)

The following files were modified:

* `CefSharp/PostDataExtensions.cs`
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Jun 17, 2025
Open
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 17, 2025

Note

Generated docstrings for this pull request at #5121

@amaitland
Copy link
Member

amaitland commented Jun 17, 2025

Nice one! Thanks

@amaitland amaitland merged commit c565f50 into cefsharp:master Jun 17, 2025
2 checks passed
@Matheos96 Matheos96 deleted the patch-1 branch June 17, 2025 22:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] left review comments

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@Matheos96 @AppVeyorBot @amaitland